In fact, “Taken 2” seems more like a collection of amateurishly written fan-fiction than a Hollywood production. Actors are given lines so predictable and so cliché that at times, it is difficult not to burst out laughing.
Taken 2 movie rating movie#
There isn’t anything new or inventive about “Taken 2.” The movie is melodramatic. This is even more so the case in “Taken 2.” While the engineers, choreographers and cameramen did put a real effort into the movie, it is clear that the writers and producers did not. Movies like “The Bourne Legacy” pump every last cent they can out of a series without a regard for storyline. Yes, action movies are meant to thrill and excite the audience, but plot is just as important as any other ingredient.
![taken 2 movie rating taken 2 movie rating](https://resizing.flixster.com/JJfwzvyvUhGGFYdc5eX5ehZHSVQ=/300x300/v2/https://flxt.tmsimg.com/assets/p9170723_v_h9_aa.jpg)
But it’s easy to understand why actors would be disinterested when the material they are given is monotonous and unoriginal. Tight, intense fight scenes are replaced with slow and unemotional ones that feel highly choreographed.Ĭo-stars Famke Janssen (“The Chameleon”) and Maggie Grace (“Lost”) don’t impress either.
![taken 2 movie rating taken 2 movie rating](https://film-book.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/liam-neeson-taken-2-02-350x164.png)
The youthful and energetic Neeson of “Taken” is no longer. However, it is clear that four years and several roles later, 60-year-old Neeson isn’t exactly interested in throwing himself into the part of Bryan. French director Olivier Megaton, notorious for directing third-rate action flicks (“Transporter 3,” “Columbiana”), continues his streak of disappointing audiences and robbing them blind.Ī scrubby, tired Liam Neeson (“The Grey”) returns to his role as Bryan Mills.